Diagnostic Performance of a Tablet Computer-Based Cognitive Screening Test for Identification of Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment

Background@#Early and appropriate diagnosis of amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) is clinically important because aMCI is considered the prodromal stage of dementia caused by Alzheimer’s disease (AD). aMCI is assessed using the comprehensive neuropsychological (NP) battery, but it is rater-dependent and does not provide quick results. Thus, we investigated the performance of the computerized cognitive screening test (Inbrain Cognitive Screening Test; Inbrain CST) in the diagnosis of aMCI and compared its performance to that of the Korean version of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD) test (CERAD-K), a comprehensive and pencil-and-paper NP test. @*Methods@#A total of 166 participants were included in this cross-sectional study. The participants were recruited as part of a prospective, community-based cohort study for MCI (PREcision medicine platform for mild cognitive impairment on multi-omics, imaging, evidence-based R&BD; PREMIER). All participants were assessed using the CERAD-K and the Inbrain CST. The Inbrain CST comprised seven subtests that assessed the following five cognitive domains: attention, language, visuospatial, memory, and executive functions. Seventy-six participants underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging and [ 18 F]-flutemetamol positron emission tomography (PET). We evaluated the diagnostic performance of the Inbrain CST for the identification of aMCI by comparing the findings with those of CERAD-K. We also determined the characteristics of aMCI patients as defined by the CERAD-K and Inbrain CST. @*Results@#Of the 166 participants, 93 were diagnosed with aMCI, while 73 were cognitively unimpaired. The sensitivity of the Inbrain CST for aMCI diagnosis was 81.7%, and its specificity was 84.9%. Positive and negative predictive values were 87.4% and 78.5%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy was 83.1%, and the error rate was 16.9%. Demographic and clinical characteristics between individuals with aMCI defined by the Inbrain CST and CERAD-K were not significantly different. The frequency of positive amyloid PET scan, the hippocampal/ parahippocampal volumes, and AD signature cortical thickness did not differ between the patients with aMCI defined by CERAD-K and those with aMCI defined by the Inbrain CST. @*Conclusion@#The Inbrain CST showed sufficient sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for diagnosing objective memory impairment in aMCI. In addition, aMCI patients identified by CERAD-K and the Inbrain CST showed comparable clinical and neuroimaging characteristics. Therefore, the Inbrain CST can be considered an alternative test to supplement the limitations of existing pencil-and-paper NP tests.

Clinical Practice Guideline for Dementia (Diagnosis and Evaluation):2021 Revised Edition

no abstract available.

A Review of Neuroimaging Studies in Persistent Postural-Perceptual Dizziness (PPPD) / 대한핵의학회잡지

Persistent postural-perceptual dizziness (PPPD) is a functional vestibular disease characterized by persistent dizziness, unsteadiness, and/or non-spinning vertigo, and is the most common vestibular syndrome in young adults. A stiffened postural control strategy, shift to reliance on visual over vestibular information, and hypervigilance to the environment have been suggested as possible pathophysiological mechanisms of PPPD. However, the exact mechanisms remain unclear. Recently, neuroimaging studies using magnetic resonance imaging and single photon emission computed tomography have provided pivotal insights into the pathophysiology of PPPD. The aim of this review was to evaluate and summarize the existing data on neuroimaging studies in PPPD. In summary, these studies fairly consistently reported decreased brain structure, function, and connectivity among the areas involved in multisensory vestibular processing and spatial cognition, and increased function and connectivity in the visual processing areas in patients with PPPD. The detected brain changes might reflect maladaptive and compensatory mechanisms including dysfunctional integration of multisensory vestibular information and visual dependence. Notably, various factors including personality traits (i.e., neuroticism), psychiatric comorbidities (i.e., anxiety and depression), and triggering factors (i.e., peripheral vestibular lesions) seem to modulate brain functional activity and connectivity patterns, possibly accounting for some differences across the results. Future studies should carefully control for these confounding effects in order to draw firm conclusions.

Reliability and Validity of a Short Form of the Korean Dementia Screening Questionnaire-Cognition

A Comparative Evaluation of the KDSQ-C, AD8, and SMCQ as a Cognitive Screening Test to Be Used in National Medical Check-ups in Korea

BACKGROUND: Korea has a periodic general health check-up program that uses the Korean Dementia Screening Questionnaire-Cognition (KDSQ-C) as a cognitive dysfunction screening tool. The Alzheimer Disease 8 (AD8) and Subjective Memory Complaints Questionnaire (SMCQ) are also used in clinical practice. We compared the diagnostic ability of these screening questionnaires for cognitive impairment when completed by participants and their caregivers. Hence, we aimed to evaluate whether the SMCQ or AD8 is superior to the KDSQ-C and can be used as its replacement. METHODS: A total of 420 participants over 65 years and their informants were recruited from 11 hospitals for this study. The patients were grouped into normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia subgroups. The KDSQ-C, AD8, and SMCQ were completed separately by participants and their informants. RESULTS: A receiver operating characteristic analysis of questionnaire scores completed by participants showed that the areas under the curve (AUCs) for the KDSQ-C, AD8, and SMCQ for diagnosing dementia were 0.75, 0.8, and 0.73, respectively. Regarding informant-completed questionnaires, the AD8 (AUC of 0.93), KDSQ-C (AUC of 0.92), and SMCQ (AUC of 0.92) showed good discriminability for dementia, with no differences in discriminability between the questionnaires. CONCLUSION: When an informant-report is possible, we recommend that the KDSQ-C continues to be used in national medical check-ups as its discriminability for dementia is not different from that of the AD8 or SMCQ. Moreover, consistent data collection using the same questionnaire is important. When an informant is not available, either the KDSQ-C or AD8 may be used. However, in the cases of patient-reports, discriminability is lower than that for informant-completed questionnaires.

Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Total or Divisional Vestibular Neuritis / 대한평형의학회지

OBJECTIVES: In vestibular neuritis (VN), the lesion preferentially affects the superior vestibular nerve because of the anatomic arrangement. It is well known that VN patients have a higher score of metabolic syndrome or a higher incidence of vertebral artery hypoplasia than controls. However, it is unclear whether the frequency of cardiovascular risk factors can affect the selective involvement of the branch of the vestibular nerve. Thus, we investigated the influence of cardiovascular risk factors on the development of total- or divisional VN. METHODS: 61 patients with VN were enrolled. Video head impulse tests and caloric tests were performed to determine which vestibular divisionswere affected. The patients were divided into divisional-VN (superior or inferior) and total-VN groups. Statistical analysis of the frequency of cardiovascular risk factors was performed only in superior and total VN groups because the number of inferior VN patients was too small to be statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Nineteen (31.1%) patients were classified as the total-VN group. In the divisional-VN group (42 patients, 65.6%), 40 were superior VN. The frequency of cardiovascular risk factors are not significantly different in superior VN and total-VN groups (All patients 50/61 [82.0%], superior-VN 36/40 [90.0%], total-VN 13/19 [68.4%]). The frequency of having more than one cardiovascular risk factor was slightly higher in the superior VN group, (13 [68.4%] vs. 36 [90.0%], p=0.062) but did not show any significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: The number of cardiovascular risk factors did not differ in superior VN patients compared to total VN patients.